SPONSOR ADS by Antelope Valley Car Dealerships


  HOMEPAGE

 

 

DIRECTORY CATEGORIES

Antelope Valley Auto Dealers

2010 Muscle Cars Antelope Valley Auto Reveiws

2010 and 2011 Auto Reveiws

Automotive Career

Automotive Wiring Free

General Automotive Information

Automotive Forums



 

2010 AUTOS ON Antelope Valley CAR LOTS NOW

Chevy deals in Antelope Valley

SPONSOR ADS By Antelope Valley Auto Dealerships


2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS - Comparison Tests - Second place

By AARON ROBINSON

2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS V8 - Short Take Road Test
Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and one sinister-looking new Camaro. Love or hate the styling (some on our panel didn’t exactly love it), credit GM for modernizing, rather than simply mimeographing, its iconic sports coupe.

We’d have preferred a reinvention with more visibility, though. The choptop is pure outlaw, but with 426 horsepower and yards of hiked-up sheetmetal to mind, the Camaro feels like it has less glass than a Nikon. The seats are low, and the dash and doors close in like canyon cliffs, with rear-quarter views pinched by the upswept shoulders and a tsunami of C-pillar. Smallish side mirrors complete the vision jamming.

Because you see so much of the interior, we’re thankful that GM designers committed their best ideas to it: the wing-shaped gauge pods, the deep-dish steering wheel, the unusual waistband of black fabric. The console dials—oil pressure, oil temp, volts, and transmission temp—are welcome, even if they’re down by the floor.

True, our butts eventually grew tired of the hard buckets, and the back seat lacks reasonable headroom, but our fingers never got frustrated working the well-placed radio buttons and the tightly clustered climate controls.

It’s not a Camaro unless it can set fire to a burnout box. Frankly, we expected the 60-mph mark to arrive sooner than 4.8 seconds. That’s only a 10th better than the Mustang, which has 111 fewer horsepower (and is 300 pounds lighter). Still, the Camaro was quicker through the quarter-mile, and our low-miles test car may still have been tight. Even if true, the 6.2 socks it to you in the low and midrange revs much harder than either the peaky Dodge or the Ford. It also drains the tank quicker, returning 14 mpg to the Mustang’s 17. The LS3 makes a muffled, less enthralling grumble than the Mustang.

If not quite the bolter we had expected, the Camaro SS carves nice squiggles, with tamped-down body motions, tacky grip, and a brake pedal so firm and responsive that we checked it for a Porsche part number. We wish Porsche had supplied the steering. Shades of Camaros past are evident in the slightly overboosted and overinsulated wheel. And the pedals are widespread and offset, making fast footwork a challenge for all but the size 14s in the group.
As you can see, this Camaro is more multidimensional than the one-trick quarter-milers that used to wear the badge.
To wit, its story is complicated: The stiff, insulated structure soaks up engine vibes and tire moaning, but the rear end discombobulates and dances while accelerating over rough pavement. The freeway chop-chop, though stiffest in this group, is still tolerably muted, but the clutch takeup is high and abrupt. Palming the Tremec TR6060’s short, precise shifter is satisfying, but the trunk is small and its opening smaller. You don’t load bags so much as push them through a mail slot. Alas, most of history’s blockbuster cars had faults aplenty. Continued...
Continued... In This Story
* Third: 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T
* First: 2010 Ford Mustang GT
* Modern Muscle Car Battle

More 2010 Dodge Challenger Info.
2010 Saleen S281 Mustang Revealed

About Antelope Valley Auto .com

Antelope Valley Auto.com has a knack for research on cars and anything and everything about them. And a love for American muscle cars. We work hard to find Automotive information that our readers want and enjoy.


Circulated by Antelope Valley Auto .com




 




  Copyright 2009. Antelopevalleyauto.com All Rights Reserved.